<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>This is Conlan &#187; Cliché</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisisconlan.com/category/cliche/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisisconlan.com</link>
	<description>sense/nonsense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:13:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Think for yourself, and shut up about it</title>
		<link>http://thisisconlan.com/2007/09/02/think-for-yourself-and-shut-up-about-it/</link>
		<comments>http://thisisconlan.com/2007/09/02/think-for-yourself-and-shut-up-about-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Conlan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cliché]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisisconlan.com/2007/09/02/think-for-yourself-and-shut-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a rule, when I find myself speaking (or thinking) in phrases I&#8217;ve heard on televised &#8220;debates&#8221; or on cable news channels, I take the opportunity to immediately examine what it is I&#8217;m actually saying. Nine times out of 11, the result is roughly equivalent to the muted horn speech of Charlie Brown&#8217;s teacher. It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a rule, when I find myself speaking (or thinking) in phrases I&#8217;ve heard on televised &#8220;debates&#8221; or on cable news channels, I take the opportunity to immediately examine what it is I&#8217;m actually saying. Nine times out of 11, the result is roughly equivalent to the muted horn speech of Charlie Brown&#8217;s teacher.</p>
<p>It puzzles me that those who shout &#8220;Think for yourself!&#8221; the loudest are simply repeating what they&#8217;ve heard from others before them, and with a distinct lack of applied thought. It should tip us off when both sides of a debate are telling the other to think for themselves. What does it mean to &#8220;think for yourself&#8221;? How could you not think for yourself? If no one is thinking for themselves, where are all these thought coming from?</p>
<p>With few exceptions, every opinion you or I or anyone has is essentially repeated from some other authority. Whether it&#8217;s our parents, religion, political pundits, some YouTube video, or our favorite movie star, we&#8217;re just repeating stuff. And that&#8217;s fine. That&#8217;s how it&#8217;s <i>should</i> be. If we had to begin for ourselves at Socrates and work through 3000 years of contemplation, we&#8217;d be totally immobile. The worst thing we could do is &#8220;think for ourselves.&#8221;</p>
<p>The trick is—to parrot another party line—&#8221;Test everything. Hold on to what is good.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thisisconlan.com/2007/09/02/think-for-yourself-and-shut-up-about-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A walking contradiction, standing still</title>
		<link>http://thisisconlan.com/2007/08/19/a-walking-contradiction-standing-still/</link>
		<comments>http://thisisconlan.com/2007/08/19/a-walking-contradiction-standing-still/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 04:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Conlan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cliché]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisisconlan.com/2007/08/19/a-walking-contradiction-standing-still/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of people describe themselves as a complex assortment of contrasting sensibilities. And maybe they are, but not for the reasons they give: &#8220;I&#8217;m a walking contradiction: I like pop music and country music! ZOMG LOL!!1!&#8221; &#8220;I like watching TV. And I like reading books! I&#8217;m so random!&#8221; &#8220;I&#8217;m so unpredictable. Sometimes I like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> 	A lot of people describe themselves as a complex assortment of contrasting sensibilities. And maybe they are, but not for the reasons they give:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I&#8217;m a walking contradiction: I like pop music <em>and</em> country music! ZOMG LOL!!1!&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I like watching TV. <em>And I like reading books!</em> I&#8217;m so random!&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I&#8217;m so unpredictable. Sometimes I like to go out and other times&#8230; you&#8217;re not going to believe this&#8230; other times, I like to stay in!&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course none of these things are contradictory. You like different kinds of music. You get entertainment through multiple media. You&#8217;re a human being. There isn&#8217;t even anything odd about these things. In fact, it would be weirder if this <em>wasn&#8217;t</em> the case.</p>
<p>Then I&#8217;m stopping there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thisisconlan.com/2007/08/19/a-walking-contradiction-standing-still/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

